MONERO [XMR] REPORT - Scaling New Heights in Blockchain Performance: 2025 Portfolio / Part Two

Part Two / Page 9

‍

1. Scenario Analysis (NPV weighted): We can assign probabilities to bull/base/bear scenarios:
   
   
   
   • Bull (20% prob): Monero breaks into broader use, price target $1000 in a few years.
     
     
   • Base (60% prob): Monero grows modestly, price stabilizes $400 range.
     
     
   • Bear (20% prob): Regulatory crush, Monero stagnates or falls to $100. Weighted outcome = 0.21000 + 0.6400 + 0.2*100 = 200 + 240 + 20 = $460. Discount that (say 10% annual over 2 years ~0.82 factor) ≈ $378 implied present value. This simplistic analysis might indicate some upside vs current ~$280, albeit with heavy risk tail. It suggests Monero could be slightly undervalued if one believes the bull or base cases have decent probability. Of course, these probabilities are subjective.
     
     
2. Sharpe Ratio and Portfolio Inclusion: For a crypto portfolio, Monero has historically improved risk-adjusted returns when included, due to its moderate correlation and strong standalone returns. A study by ShapeShift in 2021 found that adding Monero to a BTC/ETH portfolio slightly improved the Sharpe ratio (An empirical review of the relationship between risk and return of ...). Given Monero’s correlation <1, it can diversify some idiosyncratic risk (especially when Bitcoin-specific or Ethereum-specific news hits). Some advanced portfolios treat Monero as an “alternative hedge” – for instance, if governments crack down on Bitcoin, Monero might benefit (hence negative correlation in that scenario). There is some evidence: in mid-2023 when rumors of stricter crypto KYC came, Monero had a brief decorrelated rally.
   
   
3. Monte Carlo Simulation (Price Path): If we simulate thousands of price paths with Monero’s vol and drift, we’d get a distribution of outcomes. While we can’t show the actual simulation here, qualitatively:
   
   
   
   • There’s a fat-tail probability of extremely high outcomes (if adoption snowballs or if fiat crises drive people into Monero – akin to Bitcoin’s tail scenarios).
     
     
   • There’s also a significant probability of large declines (regulatory ban in a big country could cut value quickly).
     
     
   • The median outcome might be modest growth (drift slightly positive to reflect tech adoption trend). A Monte Carlo might show, for example, a 1-year expected return of, say, +20% with a standard deviation of 80%. The Sharpe ratio of around 0.25 for one-year ahead (not annualized) would be consistent with high uncertainty.
     
     

Comparative Performance: It’s useful to compare Monero to:

• Bitcoin: Monero has underperformed Bitcoin since 2018 in pure price terms (BTC hit new ATH in 2021, Monero just matched its 2017 ATH nominally). Over a 5-year horizon, BTC’s return (+340% since May 2020) edges Monero’s (+180% since May 2020). However, in 2023-2024, Monero outperformed Bitcoin; for example, in the first 4 months of 2025, XMR was +80% vs BTC +~70%. Over the long run, Monero tends to roughly keep pace with BTC in bull runs and lose ground in manic phases (when investors chase more liquid or regulated coins).
  
  
• Equities/Gold: Monero is largely uncorrelated to stocks or gold. It has served as neither a clear hedge nor a correlated asset. It moves with crypto sentiment. For risk modeling, one might treat Monero as part of the crypto allocation rather than as a hedge to equities (unlike Bitcoin which some consider as digital gold hedge).
  
  
• Competitors: We will discuss in the next section, but from a market standpoint: Zcash, for instance, is down ~98% from ATH and has not shown strength, indicating Monero captured market preference. If one had bet on Monero vs Zcash three years ago, Monero vastly outperformed (ZEC at ~$40 now from $900 ATH; Monero at $280 from $480 ATH). That performance gap is an argument that Monero’s community-driven approach and consistent delivery beat out more corporate but optional-privacy approaches.
  
  

Market Sentiment: Finally, gauge sentiment:

• Monero doesn’t attract as much speculative frenzy on social media as meme or DeFi coins. It has a steadier, more utility-driven demand. Sometimes this makes it a sleeper pick that rallies later in cycles.
  
  
• In 2025, sentiment among privacy advocates is strong (they see Monero as essential given increasing surveillance). Among general traders, Monero is sometimes overlooked due to lack of hype news. However, when news like “Monero used in massive hack laundering” hits Forbes (Zicutake USA Comment on X: "Monero Surges To $317 After ...), it reminds the market of Monero’s unique position, often sparking short-term interest.
  
  
• One potential sentiment catalyst: if any large influential figure or institution ever publicly endorsed using Monero (rare due to legal caution), it could change perceptions. For now, Monero remains somewhat contrarian or under-the-radar in mainstream crypto discourse.
  
  

Conclusion of Market Analysis: Monero’s market dynamics reflect a highly volatile asset with strong niche demand and constrained supply channels. It has delivered competitive returns historically, albeit with large swings, and it stands out for its resilience in adverse conditions (often weathering crypto downturns relatively well). For a sophisticated investor, Monero offers diversification within crypto (given its unique use case and correlation profile) and exposure to the theme of financial privacy. The key risks to monitor are regulatory escalations and any stagnation in user growth, while key potential upsides are broader adoption via new tools and potential safe-haven flows if privacy becomes a paramount concern.

In the next section, we will compare Monero to its competitors and broader crypto projects, to further contextualize its position in the market.

Additional Sources – Market Dynamics:

• CoinMarketCap / CoinGecko Monero Page: Current price, volume, market cap, and historical charts (Monero price today, XMR to USD live price, marketcap and chart) (Monero Price: XMR Live Price Chart, Market Cap & News Today).
  
  
• Messari Analyst Report (if any recent): Messari profiles often include risk metrics, correlation data, Sharpe ratios for assets (Monero Price, XMR to USD, Research, News & Fundraising | Messari).
  
  
• Coin Metrics State of Network: Some editions have covered privacy coins, including Monero’s on-chain trends and market analysis.
  
  
• CryptoCompare / Binance Research (2020): “Privacy Coins Analysis” – might have comparative performance and volatility info.
  
  
• TradingView / Macroaxis: Data on correlation (like the Macroaxis snippet showing BTC vs XMR correlation (Correlation Between Bitcoin and Monero | BTC.CC vs. XMR.CC)) and possibly XMR’s beta.
  
  
• Portfolio Backtesting Blogs: Some crypto funds have blogged about how adding Monero affected portfolio performance. For example, posts titled like “Building a privacy coin basket” or “Should you hold Monero in a Bitcoin portfolio?”
  
  
• Forbes (April 2025): Article on Monero’s surge after hack (Zicutake USA Comment on X: "Monero Surges To $317 After ...) – provides narrative on market reaction to news.
  
  
• CoinDesk Market Report (Mar 2025): “It’s back to Bitcoin for darknet markets after Monero’s Binance delisting” (It's Back to BTC for Darknet Markets After Monero's Binance Delisting: Chainalysis ) – insight into how market liquidity (or lack thereof) forced behavior changes.
  
  
• Crypto Market Volatility Indexes: e.g., BitVol and variants for other coins. If any service tracks XMR volatility specifically, that could be cited. Otherwise, historical price standard deviation calculations from data.
  
  
• Chainalysis / Crystal Blockchain reports: Sometimes they quantify liquidity – e.g., number of exchanges that supported Monero over time (which declined).
  
  
• Analyst Commentary: Perhaps a snippet from a Motley Fool or BeInCrypto article that said “Monero has shown remarkable strength, up Y% year to date” (Monero Price Prediction 2025: XMR Emerges as the Silent Winner) – indicating relative performance.
  
  
• Order Book Analysis: A screenshot or data from an exchange showing Monero order book depth vs other coins (if available, to illustrate liquidity).
  
  
• Volatility Comparison Chart: Could be custom but perhaps some research (maybe by Binance in 2019) compared altcoin volatilities.
  
  

Competitive Landscape: Privacy Coins and Broader Crypto

Monero operates in a competitive environment, both among dedicated privacy-focused cryptocurrencies and in the broader context of cryptocurrencies that offer partial privacy features or alternative value propositions. In this section, we compare Monero to its main privacy coin competitors – such as Zcash, Dash, and others – and also consider how Monero stacks up against broader crypto projects (like Bitcoin and Ethereum) in the domain of privacy and use case overlap.

Privacy Coin Competitors

Zcash (ZEC): Launched in 2016, Zcash is often considered Monero’s primary competitor in privacy. It uses zk-SNARK technology to enable private transactions.

• Privacy Model: Zcash offers optional privacy. Users can send “shielded” transactions (encrypted addresses and amounts via zk-SNARKs) or transparent transactions similar to Bitcoin. In practice, a minority of Zcash transactions are shielded – currently only ~20% of transactions fully hide sender and receiver, and an even smaller percentage hide amounts (as many transactions move between shielded and transparent pools) (Monero: All About the Top Privacy Coin - Chainalysis) (Monero: All About the Top Privacy Coin - Chainalysis). Monero, by contrast, is private-by-default for 100% of transactions. This default approach means all XMR have the same privacy, whereas ZEC has a split pool, potentially leading to fungibility issues (transparent ZEC are traceable, shielded ZEC are not).
  
  
• Anonymity Set: Zcash’s shielded transactions can have a large anonymity set (all coins in the shielded pool). In theory this is larger than Monero’s current ring of 16. However, because shielded usage is low, the effective anonymity set for Zcash users is limited by how many people actually use shielding. As of 2023, the largest shielded pool (Sapling) had a few hundred thousand outputs – providing a strong anonymity set for those using it, but still a subset of the network (Monero: All About the Top Privacy Coin - Chainalysis). Monero’s anonymity set per transaction (16) is smaller, but every Monero user benefits from it, and research indicates chain analysis is largely thwarted (Monero - Wikipedia) (Monero - Wikipedia). With upcoming Seraphis, Monero’s anonymity per tx could greatly increase, potentially surpassing Zcash’s approach while maintaining default usage.
  
  
• Performance: Zcash’s zk-SNARKs are computationally heavy but have improved (Halo 2 update removed need for a trusted setup). Still, running a full Zcash node is resource-intensive if verifying all shielded transactions. Monero’s transactions are larger but verification is reasonably fast (especially after CLSAG and Bulletproofs). Monero’s blockchain is larger in size (due to every tx having ring sigs), whereas Zcash’s is smaller (fewer users, and shielded proof data is succinct). In terms of scalability, neither can yet handle massive throughput as-is, but both are sufficient for current usage.
  
  
• Monetary Policy & Governance: Zcash has a fixed supply of 21M like Bitcoin, with periodic halvings. It had a “Founders’ Reward” where 20% of mining rewards for first 4 years went to founders/investors and Zcash Foundation. Now it has a continued developer fund (in 2020, Zcash community voted to allocate 20% of mining rewards to a dev fund through 2024). This means Zcash has a semi-centralized funding (Electric Coin Co. and Zcash Foundation use that money). Monero’s emission (infinite tail) vs Zcash’s capped supply is a contrast: Zcash emphasizes scarcity (some speculate it as an investment, but its inflation was initially very high and price performance has lagged). From an investor view, Zcash’s cap is a plus, but the heavy inflation early on (ZEC still inflating ~12% annually until next halving) diluted holders. Monero’s tail emission is tiny in comparison now (Monero Mining: Full Guide on How to Mine Monero - BitDegree).
  
  
• Adoption: Zcash is listed on more U.S. exchanges (Gemini, etc.) because of its compliance-friendly optional privacy and founding team’s outreach. However, ironically its adoption (transactions/day and user base) remains far lower than Monero’s. For instance, Zcash transactions per day are typically in the low thousands vs Monero’s ~20k (Monero: All About the Top Privacy Coin - Chainalysis) (Monero: All About the Top Privacy Coin - Chainalysis). Many ZEC users don’t use the privacy feature at all, making it less of a private currency in practice. On darknet markets, Zcash is rarely used relative to Monero.
  
  
• Security & Research: Both projects have strong cryptographers. Zcash’s tech (zk-SNARK) is more cutting-edge academically, but also newer and possibly less battle-tested than Monero’s ring signatures. Zcash had a famous ceremony/trusted setup (potential attack if compromised, though new Halo removes this). Monero had its share of bugs but none exploited to our knowledge. Monero’s community is quick to apply research (like integrating Bulletproofs before Zcash implemented something similar).
  
  
• Market Perception: Monero is seen as the “pragmatic privacy coin” with grassroots support, while Zcash is seen as a more corporate, VC-funded attempt at privacy coin. Zcash’s price has struggled; it’s down ~98% from peak, whereas Monero is ~40% off peak. Market cap: Monero ~$5B vs Zcash ~$600M (Monero: All About the Top Privacy Coin - Chainalysis), meaning market clearly favors Monero currently. A quote summarizing: “For those who prioritize absolute privacy, Monero is the preferred choice, while Zcash might appeal to those who value regulatory compliance and optional privacy” (Is this accurate information? "Monero vs ZCash - Bitcoin Talk) (Is this accurate information? "Monero vs ZCash - Bitcoin Talk).
  
  
• In short, Zcash’s optional privacy and governance decisions have limited its adoption, making Monero the leader.
  
  

Dash (DASH): An older coin (2014, originally “Darkcoin”). Dash pioneered coin-mixing with its PrivateSend feature (a CoinJoin-based mixer executed by masternodes).

• Privacy: Dash’s PrivateSend is optional and not even on by default. It requires users to actively mix funds in rounds using Dash’s masternodes (which coordinate mixing). This provides some privacy but is weaker – amounts aren’t hidden, and the anonymity set is limited by how many participants join each round. Moreover, because Dash still reveals addresses (just shuffles who owns which outputs), chain analytics can sometimes still cluster addresses or see through incomplete mixes. Dash’s privacy is significantly weaker than Monero’s (Chainalysis officially confirms that Monero is still causing problems). In fact, in 2021 Dash’s team pivoted to saying Dash is “not really a privacy coin” but just a digital currency with an optional mixer, likely to avoid regulatory issues. Dash transactions are mostly transparent; PrivateSend usage is low.

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PART Two / PAGE 10: www.thestandard.io/blog/monero-xmr-report---scaling-new-heights-in-blockchain-performance-2025-portfolio-part-two-10