Ethereum Classic (ETC): Ensuring Liquidity, Managing Market Dynamics, and Exploring Exit Strategies for Long-Term Stability and Growth in 2025

Part 1 / Page 11

‍

3B. Network Architecture

Ethereum Classic’s network architecture is designed to support decentralized applications (dApps) and smart contracts while maintaining a high level of security and scalability. The architecture is based on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), which allows developers to execute smart contracts on the network. While Ethereum Classic shares many of the same architectural elements as Ethereum, its focus on PoW and its commitment to immutability set it apart from Ethereum.

1. Ethereum Classic’s Architecture: The Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)

The Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) is at the heart of Ethereum Classic’s network architecture. The EVM is a decentralized computing environment that executes smart contracts and processes transactions on the Ethereum Classic blockchain. It is a Turing-complete virtual machine, meaning it can execute any algorithmic computation, allowing for the execution of complex smart contracts and dApps.

The EVM’s gas model ensures that computational resources used by smart contracts are paid for, preventing infinite loops or resource abuse on the network. Each operation that a smart contract performs on the network consumes gas, a measure of the computational work required to execute the contract. Users must pay for gas in Ether (ETH) or Ethereum Classic’s native token, ETC, making the system more efficient and sustainable (Ethereum Virtual Machine).

Ethereum Classic’s network architecture is structured to ensure that the blockchain is secure and decentralized, with no central authority controlling the network. Instead, miners validate transactions and create new blocks by solving complex cryptographic puzzles. This PoW consensus model ensures that the network is secure from censorship and attacks while keeping Ethereum Classic’s decentralized nature intact (Ethereum Classic Network Architecture).

2. Ethereum Classic’s Decentralized Infrastructure

Ethereum Classic’s infrastructure is designed to operate in a fully decentralized environment, with no single entity or group controlling the network. The blockchain is maintained by a large number of nodes distributed across the globe. These nodes work together to validate transactions and secure the network, ensuring that the blockchain remains resilient to attacks and open to all participants.

Ethereum Classic’s decentralized architecture allows it to remain censorship-resistant, as no central authority can alter the transaction history or freeze accounts. The network’s global distribution of nodes ensures that Ethereum Classic remains open, transparent, and trustless, with no single point of failure (Ethereum Classic’s Decentralized Nodes).

The mining community also plays a critical role in maintaining the decentralized nature of the network. By validating transactions and securing the network through PoW mining, miners help Ethereum Classic maintain its censorship-resistant and immutable blockchain. Without a centralized mining authority, Ethereum Classic’s network remains distributed and open to all users, reinforcing its core values of decentralization and trustless computing (Ethereum Classic’s Mining Community).

3C. Consensus Mechanism

Ethereum Classic operates on the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism, which is a fundamental part of its network security and decentralization. PoW ensures that transactions are validated and secure, with no need for a central authority to oversee the process. Instead, miners use computational power to solve complex mathematical problems and verify transactions. The first miner to solve the problem is rewarded with ETC, and the new block is added to the blockchain.

1. Proof of Work: A Secure and Decentralized Consensus Mechanism

PoW is one of the most well-established consensus mechanisms in the blockchain space, providing a secure and decentralized way to validate transactions and maintain network integrity. Ethereum Classic’s PoW mechanism has been a core part of the network since its inception and has proven to be a reliable and secure method for securing the blockchain.

PoW requires miners to expend computational resources to solve cryptographic puzzles. The complexity of these puzzles ensures that attackers cannot easily manipulate the network, as they would need to control a majority of the network’s mining power to alter the blockchain. This makes Ethereum Classic highly secure and resistant to censorship (Proof of Work Consensus Mechanism).

PoW also provides economic incentives for miners. By rewarding miners with ETC, Ethereum Classic ensures that there is always a financial motivation for miners to participate in the network and maintain its security. This economic model is crucial for the decentralization of the network, as it prevents any single entity from gaining too much control over the network.

2. PoW vs. PoS: The Ongoing Debate

Ethereum Classic’s commitment to PoW sets it apart from Ethereum, which has transitioned to Proof of Stake (PoS). PoS is seen by many as a more energy-efficient consensus mechanism, as it does not require miners to expend large amounts of computational power. However, PoS has its own set of challenges, including concerns over centralization and the potential for large stakeholders to control the network.

In contrast, Ethereum Classic’s PoW model has been proven to be secure and decentralized, but it also comes with its own challenges, particularly in terms of energy consumption and the risk of mining centralization. As Ethereum Classic continues to grow, the debate between PoW and PoS will likely remain a key consideration for its future development (PoW vs. PoS Debate).

3D. Scalability Solutions

Scalability is one of the most pressing challenges facing Ethereum Classic as it seeks to expand and accommodate increasing transaction volumes. As with other blockchains, Ethereum Classic faces the challenge of ensuring that its network can handle high throughput while maintaining low transaction costs and high security. This section will explore the scalability solutions that have been proposed and implemented within the Ethereum Classic ecosystem.

1. Challenges with Scaling Ethereum Classic

One of the biggest challenges for Ethereum Classic is scaling the network to meet the growing demand for decentralized applications (dApps) and transactions. While Ethereum Classic’s PoW consensus mechanism ensures network security, it can also limit the network’s transaction throughput. This is because PoW requires miners to solve complex cryptographic puzzles, which can slow down transaction processing times and increase transaction costs during periods of high demand (Ethereum Classic Scaling Challenges).

To address these scalability issues, Ethereum Classic has looked at several solutions, including Layer 2 scaling solutions, such as state channels and sidechains. These solutions allow for off-chain transactions, reducing the load on the main Ethereum Classic blockchain and improving transaction throughput.

2. Layer 2 Scaling Solutions

Layer 2 solutions are seen as a key way to scale blockchain networks like Ethereum Classic without sacrificing security or decentralization. Layer 2 solutions work by taking transactions off the main Ethereum Classic chain and executing them on a secondary layer. Once transactions are completed, they are then committed back to the main blockchain.

One of the most promising Layer 2 solutions for Ethereum Classic is state channels, which allow users to conduct multiple transactions off-chain while ensuring that the final result is recorded on the blockchain. State channels have the potential to reduce transaction costs and increase transaction throughput, making them a critical part of Ethereum Classic’s scalability strategy (Ethereum Classic Layer 2 Solutions).

3. Sidechains and Sharding

Another potential scalability solution for Ethereum Classic is sidechains. Sidechains are independent blockchains that are connected to the main Ethereum Classic network, allowing for interoperability and scaling. By offloading transactions to sidechains, Ethereum Classic can improve its scalability without compromising the security and immutability of the main chain.

Ethereum Classic has also explored the possibility of implementing sharding, a technique that splits the blockchain into smaller, more manageable pieces called shards. Sharding could significantly increase Ethereum Classic’s scalability by allowing it to process transactions in parallel, rather than sequentially. However, the implementation of sharding is complex and requires significant development work (Sharding and Scalability Solutions).

Conclusion

Ethereum Classic’s technology and infrastructure are built on the principles of decentralization and immutability, with a strong focus on security and scalability. The network’s use of PoW consensus ensures that it remains secure and resistant to censorship, while its decentralized architecture allows for community-driven governance. However, scalability remains one of the key challenges for Ethereum Classic, and the team is exploring Layer 2 solutions, sidechains, and sharding to improve the network’s capacity to handle increasing transaction volumes.

As Ethereum Classic continues to evolve, its commitment to innovation, decentralization, and security will be key to its long-term success. By implementing scalable solutions and improving its mining ecosystem, Ethereum Classic can position itself as a secure, efficient, and decentralized alternative to Ethereum and other blockchain platforms.

Let’s continue with the next three parts of Section 3: 3E. Security Model and Audits, 3F. Decentralization Aspects, and 3G. Security Audits and Reliability. These sections will address the security measures employed by Ethereum Classic, the decentralization of the network, and the results of security audits conducted on the platform.

3E. Security Model and Audits

Ethereum Classic (ETC) is built on a robust security model designed to protect the network from a variety of attacks, particularly those targeting its Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. In this section, we will explore Ethereum Classic's security measures, the auditing processes used to ensure the integrity of its network, and the risks that remain. We will also review the outcomes of security audits and the steps taken by the development team to address vulnerabilities and ensure the platform's ongoing safety.

1. Ethereum Classic's Security Model: Proof of Work (PoW)

At the heart of Ethereum Classic’s security model is its use of the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. PoW is a time-tested security model used by many blockchain platforms, most notably Bitcoin. Under PoW, miners use computational resources to solve complex cryptographic puzzles in order to validate transactions and add new blocks to the blockchain. This process makes it extremely difficult for malicious actors to gain control of the network, as it requires an enormous amount of computational power to reorganize the blockchain or reverse transactions.

While PoW provides robust security, it also has some drawbacks, particularly in terms of energy consumption and mining centralization. As Ethereum Classic continues to evolve, the network must ensure that it maintains a decentralized mining ecosystem to prevent attacks that could arise from concentrated mining power. 51% attacks, for instance, remain a key concern for Ethereum Classic, especially given the relatively smaller mining pool size compared to larger networks like Ethereum or Bitcoin.

Despite these concerns, Ethereum Classic’s PoW mechanism has been effective in maintaining a secure and censorship-resistant network. The protocol’s focus on blockchain immutability means that once a transaction is confirmed, it cannot be altered, ensuring a high degree of trustworthiness and integrity in the system (Proof of Work Security Model).

2. 51% Attack Risk and Mitigation Efforts

One of the primary risks facing Ethereum Classic is the potential for a 51% attack. A 51% attack occurs when a group of miners controls more than 50% of the network’s hashrate, giving them the ability to manipulate transactions, double-spend coins, and potentially reverse the history of the blockchain. While Ethereum Classic’s PoW mechanism offers robust security, it is still vulnerable to this type of attack if mining centralization occurs, as larger mining pools could gain enough control to disrupt the network.

Ethereum Classic has experienced several 51% attacks in the past, most notably in 2019 and 2020. These attacks led to double-spending incidents, where attackers used the network’s vulnerabilities to spend the same ETC tokens more than once. In response to these attacks, the Ethereum Classic team has implemented security measures aimed at strengthening the network’s defenses, such as increasing the network’s hashrate, implementing algorithm adjustments, and collaborating with external security audits to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities (51% Attack on Ethereum Classic).

3. Security Audits and Vulnerability Testing

In addition to its PoW security model, Ethereum Classic undergoes regular security audits to identify vulnerabilities in the network’s smart contracts and protocols. These audits are critical for maintaining the integrity of the blockchain and preventing exploits that could compromise users' funds or damage the network’s reputation.

One of the key auditing firms involved in Ethereum Classic’s security efforts is Quantstamp, a leading provider of blockchain security and smart contract auditing services. Quantstamp has conducted several comprehensive security assessments of Ethereum Classic’s codebase, identifying vulnerabilities and offering recommendations for improvement. Other third-party auditors, such as Trail of Bits and CertiK, have also performed security checks on Ethereum Classic’s infrastructure, focusing on identifying potential weaknesses that could expose the network to attacks (Security Audits in Ethereum Classic).

The results of these audits have been used to strengthen the network by addressing identified vulnerabilities. The Ethereum Classic team takes a proactive approach to security, regularly applying fixes and upgrades based on the audit findings to improve the reliability and robustness of the network.

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PART 1 / PAGE 12: www.thestandard.io/blog/ethereum-classic-etc-ensuring-liquidity-managing-market-dynamics-and-exploring-exit-strategies-for-long-term-stability-and-growth-in-2025-12