Ethereum Classic (ETC): Ensuring Liquidity, Managing Market Dynamics, and Exploring Exit Strategies for Long-Term Stability and Growth in 2025 / Part 2

Part 2 / Page 9

‍

9A. Governance Model in Practice (DAO)

Ethereum Classic (ETC) is renowned for its decentralized governance model, which allows community members to make decisions and influence the direction of the network. Ethereum Classic’s DAO model sets it apart from other blockchain platforms that have centralized governance or are subject to the influence of a small group of stakeholders. This open-source governance model provides a level of transparency and accountability rarely seen in traditional blockchain projects.

Ethereum Classic’s DAO framework is structured to encourage participation from a diverse range of stakeholders, including miners, developers, users, and investors. The ability for community members to submit proposals, vote on decisions, and influence the platform’s evolution is a core feature of the network’s identity. However, this decentralized model also comes with its own set of challenges that must be addressed to ensure that Ethereum Classic can continue to grow and remain relevant in the ever-evolving blockchain space.

1. The Foundation of Ethereum Classic’s DAO Model

Ethereum Classic’s DAO model stems from the community-driven nature of the project. When Ethereum split into Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC) after the DAO hack in 2016, Ethereum Classic decided to continue the original chain without any alterations, emphasizing its belief in immutability and decentralization. Ethereum Classic has remained steadfast in upholding these principles by incorporating a community governance model that facilitates collaborative decision-making and allows for open participation (Ethereum Classic Governance).

In practice, Ethereum Classic’s DAO is based on code-as-law principles. This means that decisions made by the community and proposals implemented through on-chain governance are final and immutable. There is no central authority or company that controls the decision-making process. Instead, power is distributed among network participants, ensuring that the platform remains true to its decentralized roots. This model contrasts with more centralized blockchain projects where decisions are made by a select few executives or foundations (Blockchain Governance).

2. The Ethereum Classic DAO Process: Proposal, Voting, and Execution

Ethereum Classic’s DAO governance process involves the submission of proposals, followed by community voting, and the execution of approved proposals. The process is designed to ensure that all stakeholders can contribute their ideas and opinions, leading to decisions that reflect the needs and desires of the entire community.

Proposals are submitted by developers, miners, or network participants who believe that a change to the network protocol, security features, or funding allocation is necessary. These proposals may be technical in nature, such as updates to the smart contract system, or they may involve funding decisions related to ecosystem growth, security audits, or community outreach programs (Ethereum Classic Proposal Process).

Once a proposal has been submitted, it enters a community review period, where stakeholders can express their opinions, suggest modifications, and debate the merits of the proposal. This stage is essential to ensuring that the decision-making process is inclusive and that all perspectives are considered. Developers, miners, users, and investors all have a role to play in the discussion (Community Engagement in Blockchain).

Following the review period, the proposal proceeds to on-chain voting. In on-chain voting, participants cast their votes based on their stake in the network—usually determined by the number of ETC tokens they hold or the mining power they control. The more significant the stake, the more influence the voter has on the final decision. Ethereum Classic’s voting process is fully transparent and auditable, meaning anyone can track the results and verify that the process was fair and consistent (On-Chain Voting).

Once the vote concludes, and if the proposal passes with sufficient community support, the proposal is executed by the network. This is done through smart contracts, which automatically implement the approved changes without the need for intermediaries or central authority. This process ensures that Ethereum Classic’s decisions are executed securely, transparently, and efficiently (Ethereum Classic Smart Contracts).

3. Benefits of Ethereum Classic’s DAO Model

Ethereum Classic’s DAO governance model offers several key benefits that differentiate it from more traditional blockchain governance models. These benefits contribute to the platform’s appeal for both developers and investors:

• Transparency: Every proposal, discussion, vote, and decision made within the Ethereum Classic ecosystem is publicly visible on the blockchain. This transparency fosters trust and accountability among stakeholders, making it easier for participants to track and verify the decision-making process.
  
  
• Decentralization: The DAO model ensures that no single entity or organization has control over Ethereum Classic’s development. Instead, decisions are made by a global community of stakeholders, which helps preserve the network’s decentralized ethos. This contrasts with more centralized blockchain models, where decisions may be influenced by a small group of executives or foundation members (Decentralized Blockchain Governance).
  
  
• Censorship Resistance: Because Ethereum Classic’s decisions are made by a decentralized group, the platform is inherently resistant to censorship. No central authority can block or alter transactions, ensuring that the platform remains a trustless, secure, and censorship-resistant network (Ethereum Classic Censorship Resistance).
  
  
• Community Engagement: Ethereum Classic’s DAO structure promotes active community engagement, allowing miners, developers, and users to contribute to the platform’s evolution. This helps ensure that the platform remains dynamic and aligned with the values and needs of its users (Ethereum Classic Community).
  

4. Challenges and Limitations of Ethereum Classic’s DAO Model

While Ethereum Classic’s DAO model offers numerous advantages, it also presents several challenges that could hinder its development and governance processes. These challenges primarily relate to the decentralized nature of the network and the inherent difficulty in achieving consensus among a diverse group of stakeholders:

• Slow Decision-Making: One of the most significant drawbacks of Ethereum Classic’s DAO model is the slow decision-making process. Because decisions are made by the community, reaching consensus can be time-consuming, especially when there are disagreements over technical upgrades or funding allocations. In a fast-moving industry like blockchain, slow decision-making can result in missed opportunities and delayed innovation (Slow Decision-Making).
  
  
• Lack of Leadership: The decentralized governance of Ethereum Classic means there is no central figure or organization that can lead the platform’s development. While this ensures transparency and community involvement, it can also lead to disorganization and fragmentation in decision-making, particularly when the community is divided on critical issues. The lack of central leadership can make it difficult to reach decisions quickly and can result in inefficient management (Lack of Leadership).
  
  
• Security Vulnerabilities in Voting: Ethereum Classic’s on-chain voting system, while transparent, is not immune to security vulnerabilities. Issues such as Sybil attacks, mining pool centralization, and voter manipulation can undermine the fairness of the voting process. This can lead to the centralization of power within a small group of miners or stakeholders, which would contradict the platform’s decentralized ethos (Voting Security in Blockchain).
  
  
• Fragmentation of the Community: Another challenge of Ethereum Classic’s DAO model is the potential for fragmentation within the community. Since decisions are made by a decentralized group, the risk of splits or forks increases if there is a lack of unity or consensus on important issues. The platform has already seen disagreements over protocol upgrades, and further fragmentation could damage the project’s reputation and adoption (Community Fragmentation).
  

5. Improvements and Future Outlook for Ethereum Classic’s DAO

To address the challenges of the DAO model, Ethereum Classic must continue to evolve its governance framework to ensure efficient decision-making, community engagement, and network security. Several improvements can be made to the governance model:

• Delegated Governance: Ethereum Classic could introduce a delegated voting system, where stakeholders elect representatives or delegates to vote on their behalf. This would help streamline the decision-making process and ensure that the most active participants in the community are the ones driving key decisions.
  
  
• Incentives for Participation: To encourage more stakeholders to participate in the governance process, Ethereum Classic could implement incentive mechanisms, such as reputation points or ETC tokens for those who actively participate in governance decisions. This would increase engagement and ensure that the governance process remains dynamic and inclusive (Ethereum Classic DAO Improvements).
  
  
• Enhanced Security in Voting: Ethereum Classic must continue to improve the security of its voting system to prevent attacks and manipulation. Implementing stronger proof-of-stake systems or incorporating zero-knowledge proofs could help secure the voting process and prevent bad actors from undermining the integrity of the governance model (Voting Security in Blockchain).
  
  

Conclusion

Ethereum Classic’s DAO governance model provides a unique approach to decentralized decision-making, prioritizing community involvement and transparency. While this model offers several advantages, including increased decentralization, censorship resistance, and security, it also presents challenges related to slow decision-making, lack of leadership, and potential security vulnerabilities.

By refining its governance processes, Ethereum Classic can continue to maintain its decentralized identity while improving the efficiency and security of its decision-making framework. With these improvements, Ethereum Classic can strengthen its community engagement, ecosystem development, and market position, ensuring its long-term sustainability and relevance in the competitive blockchain space.

9B. Developer Activity and Ecosystem Growth

Ethereum Classic (ETC) is a blockchain that, although overshadowed by Ethereum and other more scalable platforms, continues to maintain its relevance due to its commitment to immutability, security, and decentralization. As the blockchain space becomes increasingly competitive, Ethereum Classic’s ability to grow its developer ecosystem and expand its network is crucial for its long-term sustainability. This section examines the development activity on Ethereum Classic, the growth of its ecosystem, the challenges faced, and the opportunities that lie ahead. It also draws comparisons with other blockchain ecosystems in terms of developer engagement, incentives, and overall ecosystem expansion.

1. The Foundation of Ethereum Classic’s Developer Ecosystem

Ethereum Classic's approach to developer engagement is built on the foundation of its core principles—immutability and security. Following the DAO hack and the split from Ethereum, Ethereum Classic chose to remain faithful to the original Ethereum chain, maintaining its commitment to immutability and decentralization. Unlike Ethereum, which undergoes constant network upgrades, Ethereum Classic offers a more stable platform for developers interested in building permanent and unalterable applications.

Since its inception, Ethereum Classic has supported decentralized applications (dApps), smart contracts, and enterprise solutions, leveraging the platform's immutable nature to ensure that applications built on Ethereum Classic are secure and trustworthy. This emphasis on immutability appeals to developers who require a blockchain where data integrity is crucial. Over the years, Ethereum Classic has established itself as a niche platform, focused on trustless systems and data permanence (Ethereum Classic Overview).

a. Ethereum Classic’s Role in Decentralization

The decentralization of governance within Ethereum Classic is a key feature that sets it apart from Ethereum and many newer blockchains. The Ethereum Classic DAO provides a platform for community-driven governance, where all stakeholders can participate in decision-making. This commitment to a community-led ecosystem ensures that the developer community plays a crucial role in Ethereum Classic's evolution. Ethereum Classic's open-source nature allows developers from all over the world to contribute to the platform’s growth (Ethereum Classic DAO).

However, developer engagement has been slow compared to more centralized platforms like Solana or Binance Smart Chain (BSC). Ethereum Classic’s focus on decentralization and immutability offers security but does not come with the developer incentives or advanced scalability that newer platforms provide. For Ethereum Classic to remain competitive, it must address the challenges related to scalability and developer resources, while continuing to foster innovation within its decentralized ecosystem.

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PART 2 / PAGE 10: www.thestandard.io/blog/ethereum-classic-etc-ensuring-liquidity-managing-market-dynamics-and-exploring-exit-strategies-for-long-term-stability-and-growth-in-2025-part-2-10