Page 9

‍

• Guardian Audits became an ongoing security partner. They performed seven audits pre-V2 and ten after launch, as noted earlier. Guardian’s final case study praised GMX for fixing all high-severity issues and even incorporating Guardian’s test cases into their test suite (showing a commitment to continuous security). They uncovered issues like integer precision quirks and DoS vectors (e.g., if too many small orders congested the keeper queue) – GMX patched these, often implementing Guardian’s suggestions such as adding gas refunds or simplifying loops.
  
  
• Zellic and Sec3 audited the Solana deployment in early 2024. The Solana code was new, so it underwent rigorous review. Only low-level Solana-specific concerns (like rent exemption settings, which are minor) were found, no critical bugs. Sec3’s report noted the program followed secure Rust practices and had proper checks on oracle inputs. In addition to formal audits, GMX has engaged in less formal security reviews via ImmuneFi’s community – essentially, they put up bounties and had whitehats poke at the contracts. This yielded the critical GLP bug find by Collider (bounty $1M) and a few other minor findings (like a rounding error in fee distribution) which were resolved.
  
  

• Immunefi Bug Bounty: GMX’s bug bounty program on Immunefi offers up to $5,000,000 for critical exploits (one of the highest in DeFi). This sizable bounty incentivizes ethical hackers to report issues rather than exploit them. The program covers all smart contracts on all chains, meaning as new features launch (like on Solana), they fall under the same bounty. To date, the bounty program successfully led to prevention of at least one critical bug (the Collider find) and a couple of high-severity ones like a potential price oracle rounding issue that could slightly advantage an arbitrageur (fixed immediately). The bounty program’s effectiveness is evident: GMX has had no user funds stolen through its existence. The cost of the bounties paid (roughly $1.05M in total across a couple of payouts) is trivial compared to what an exploit could have cost, validating the bounty approach.
  
  
• Operational Security: The GMX team has implemented time-locks on certain governance actions to prevent sudden changes. For example, if the DAO votes to change a core parameter, there is a 12-hour timelock on Arbitrum before it takes effect (except in emergencies) – this gives users notice to adjust if needed. They’ve also got a “Guardian” role for the contracts, held by the multi-sig, which can pause trading for a specific asset or the whole platform if a serious issue is detected (used only once briefly after the AVAX incident to pause AVAX trading until the cap was applied). This pause function is a security backstop – it hasn’t been abused and would only be invoked to protect funds.
  
  
• Reliability and Uptime: GMX has operated with near 100% uptime on Arbitrum and Avalanche since launch. The only downtime has been chain-related (Arbitrum sequencer went down for 30 minutes once in 2022; Avalanche had an outage of a few minutes in 2023) – during those, users couldn’t execute trades, but the protocol itself was fine. On Solana, since launch, there was one brief network slowdown in April 2024 but no full halt; GMX-Solana handled it by allowing liquidations to backlog slightly and then clear, with no user funds lost – a good stress test passed. GMX’s front-end has also been reliable, with decentralized hosting on IPFS and backups provided (users can trade via contract calls or community UIs if needed). This focus on decentralization of the interface further ensures continuous access (the team published instructions to trade directly via Etherscan/CLI in case their site is down, but that scenario hasn’t really occurred beyond routine maintenance).
  
  
• Insurance and Safety Nets: While not a traditional security measure, GMX’s community is moving towards establishing an insurance fund (as noted), and some third-party insurance protocols like Nexus Mutual have listed GMX coverage (Nexus Mutual offers smart contract cover for GMX, which indicates they reviewed the code risk and deemed it coverable). As of now, Nexus Mutual’s capacity for GMX is modest (~$2M cover) and no claims have occurred. The very availability of insurance signals confidence from a risk perspective (Nexus won’t list a protocol with known major issues).
  
  
• Incident Response: GMX’s handling of the AVAX price manipulation in Sept 2022 is a case study in effective incident response. Although it wasn’t a smart contract hack, it was a security incident in a broader sense (economic security). The team immediately communicated via Twitter and Discord about the issue, reassuring GLP holders that the impact was limited (roughly 0.1% of pool), and within hours implemented a temporary safeguard (lowering position size limit for AVAX). They then deployed a contract update to introduce price impact within two weeks. Throughout, they were transparent about what happened and why the fix would prevent it. This openness and quick action likely prevented user panic and further attacks. It exemplifies that beyond preventative security, GMX’s team excels in responsive security – the ability to react and patch when something unexpected occurs.
  
  

In summary, GMX’s infrastructure is secure and robust. The multiple audits and continuous white-hat incentives have created a high assurance level that the contracts operate as intended. The lack of any major exploit or downtime over more than two years (covering extreme market conditions) speaks to both the code quality and the operational diligence of the team. For investors and users, this track record reduces one of the biggest risks in DeFi – smart contract failure. There is always residual risk, but GMX’s proactive measures (like the huge bounty and ongoing audits) make it as low as reasonably possible. The combination of Ethereum-grade security on Arbitrum, Avalanche’s reliable network, and careful Solana integration demonstrates that GMX’s technological choices have balanced performance and security well.

Going forward, security will remain a focus: the DAO has budgeted for regular audits of any major changes (e.g., X4 will go through new audits before launch), and the insurance fund initiative will add another layer of safety. The community’s attentiveness (e.g., many security researchers in the community independently reviewing code) also serves as an informal audit at all times. All these factors make GMX’s technology infrastructure not only innovative but also trustworthy – a critical combination for a platform intended to manage large amounts of capital.

References (Technology & Infrastructure):

1. CoinMarketCap – Network Security (Arbitrum & Avalanche) (Arbitrum inherits Ethereum security via fraud proofs; Avalanche’s DAG consensus yields fast finality; GMX audited by ABDK; $5M Immunefi bounty)
   
   
2. Chainlink Documentation – Chainlink Price Feeds on Arbitrum (GMX uses Chainlink oracles for aggregated market prices; typical update frequency ~ every minute)
   
   
3. TradingView News – GMX on Solana with Chainlink (Solana deployment uses Chainlink and Pyth oracles for transparent pricing; Solana integration effective March 2024)
   
   
4. Dedaub Audit Report – GMX Synthetics (V2) Audit Summary (Audit in Nov 2022 found minor reentrancy & logic issues, all fixed; highlights two-step execution with keepers) (GMX smart contract audit report | Dedaub Audit Reports)
   
   
5. Guardian Audits – GMX Security Case Study (84 researcher-weeks of audits; 351 issues fixed incl. 80+ critical/high; GMX integrated Guardian’s tests to prevent regressions)
   
   
6. Bitcoinist – GMX Pays $1M Bounty for GLP Bug (Collider Labs discovered a critical GLP flaw; GMX awarded $1M, preventing any exploit; bounty underscores proactive security)
   
   
7. Medium (Neptune Mutual) – Decoding the GMX Price Manipulation (Analyzes Sept 2022 AVAX manipulation; explains zero-slippage model and how attacker profited $565k; GMX’s subsequent response)
   
   
8. DefiLlama – GMX Fees and Revenue (Real-time fee data: e.g., ~$90k daily fees average in 2023; GMX stakers receiving ~30%; demonstrates sustainable revenue scaling with usage)
   
   
9. The Block Research – Decentralized Perps Landscape Q4 2024 (Highlights GMX as market leader; notes Arbitrum and Avalanche multi-chain strategy; mentions GMX’s zero major exploits vs some competitors that had issues) (The Block Research, 2024)
   
   
10. Ethereum – Arbitrum Rollup Explainer (Technical breakdown of Arbitrum’s fraud proofs and Sequencer; Arbitrum’s decentralization plan, relevant to GMX’s reliance on Arbitrum security)
    
    
11. Avalanche – Snowman Consensus Whitepaper (Explains Avalanche’s consensus used by C-Chain; sub-second finality and high throughput as utilized by GMX)
    
    
12. Zellic Audit – GMX Solana Program Audit (Audit report of GMX’s Solana Rust code, noting no critical findings; Solana adaptation maintained security standards) (Zellic, 2024)
    
    
13. DefiSafety – GMX Security Score 2023 (GMX scored ~85%; notes multiple audits, bug bounty, good testing; minor deduction due to multi-sig control requiring trust)
    
    
14. ImmuneFi Hall of Fame – GMX Bounty (Lists GMX’s $5M bug bounty among largest; successful payouts like Collider’s; highlights GMX’s commitment to white-hat incentives)
    
    

‍

4. Tokenomics & Economic Model

A. Token Utility (Use Cases)

The GMX token plays a significant role in the platform's ecosystem, serving several functions within its decentralized exchange (DEX) environment. A core use case of the token is its role in decentralized governance. By holding GMX tokens, users can participate in protocol upgrades, vote on fee structures, and determine the future of the platform. This governance model mirrors that of other successful DeFi protocols like Uniswap, which employs a similar governance structure using its native token, UNI. In Uniswap’s model, token holders are incentivized to participate in voting to influence the protocol's evolution and decision-making processes. As a result, users can have a direct influence on the platform’s economic structure.

The utility of GMX tokens also extends to staking, where holders can earn rewards by locking their tokens into liquidity pools. By staking GMX, liquidity providers receive a share of the fees generated by the protocol. This reward mechanism aligns with the one seen in Aave and Compound, two of the leading DeFi protocols, where liquidity providers are rewarded for the capital they contribute to the ecosystem. Additionally, GMX tokens can be used for yield farming, which incentivizes users to add liquidity to the platform in exchange for a portion of transaction fees. This hybrid mechanism of governance, staking, and rewards is designed to incentivize long-term engagement and liquidity provision, ensuring the platform’s growth.

For example, platforms like Uniswap and Aave have demonstrated the effectiveness of governance mechanisms in driving adoption, while SushiSwap also incentivizes liquidity providers to ensure its ecosystem thrives. GMX follows this pattern, offering more varied incentives by integrating governance and liquidity provision into a single token model. Through this combination, GMX tokens provide a multi-faceted utility that enhances the platform’s decentralization and attracts users who want both passive income and influence over the protocol’s future.

Sources:

1. “Uniswap Governance Feature” – CoinDesk
   
   
2. “Aave Tokenomics” – Aave
   
   
3. “SushiSwap Tokenomics” – SushiSwap
   
   
4. “Compound Tokenomics Overview” – Compound
   
   
5. “GMX Staking and Governance” – GMX.io
   
   
6. “Understanding Token Utility in DeFi” – DeFi Pulse
   
   
7. “Yield Farming: How It Works and Why It’s Popular” – CoinGecko
   
   
8. “Liquidity Pools: How They Work” – CoinMarketCap
   
   
9. “Governance in DeFi: A Case Study on Uniswap” – Crypto Briefing
   
   
10. “GMX Overview and Utility” – GMX Whitepaper
    
    
11. “The Role of Governance in DeFi” – Medium
    
    
12. “The Evolution of DeFi Staking” – Decrypt
    
    
13. “Liquidity Provision in DeFi” – Finextra
    
    
14. “Aave’s Staking System Explained” – Aave Documentation
    
    
15. “Why Token Utility Matters in DeFi” – Cointelegraph
    
    

B. Supply/Demand/Distribution Mechanics

The token supply and distribution model of GMX plays a critical role in its value proposition. GMX operates with a capped supply, which is designed to increase the scarcity of the token over time. The total supply is predetermined, and periodic token burns are implemented to reduce the circulating supply. This deflationary mechanism helps mitigate the potential for inflation and fosters long-term value appreciation for token holders. As seen with tokens like Binance Coin (BNB), which has a similar burn mechanism, GMX aims to increase its scarcity by reducing the total supply over time. The buyback-and-burn process is designed to support this strategy by removing tokens from circulation, which in turn drives scarcity and, theoretically, demand.

Token distribution plays a critical role in the platform's long-term success. A large portion of GMX tokens is allocated to liquidity providers and stakers. This distribution model ensures that the token holders are directly involved in the platform’s growth. In addition, early investors and team members are subject to a vesting schedule, which prevents them from flooding the market with tokens immediately after launch. Similar vesting models have been used by successful projects like Ethereum, where early backers had their tokens locked for extended periods to ensure that the market was not flooded.

The demand for GMX tokens is also driven by the fees generated through transaction activities on the platform. As more users engage with the protocol, the fees collected create a demand for GMX tokens, as these tokens are used for governance and participation in liquidity pools. The combination of a capped supply, strategic distribution, and increasing demand driven by platform activity should theoretically result in upward price pressure for the token.

Sources:

1. “Binance Coin (BNB) Burn Mechanism” – Binance
   
   
2. “GMX Token Burn Mechanism” – GMX Whitepaper
   
   
3. “Tokenomics and Distribution” – CoinGecko
   
   
4. “The Role of Token Supply in Cryptocurrency Valuation” – Investopedia
   
   
5. “Understanding the Impact of Token Supply on DeFi Projects” – CryptoBriefing
   
   
6. “Ethereum’s Token Supply Management” – Ethereum.org
   
   
7. “How to Manage Token Supply for DeFi Success” – DeFi Pulse
   
   
8. “Token Distribution: A Key Factor in Success for DeFi Projects” – Cointelegraph
   
   
9. “Vesting Schedule and Token Price Stability” – Aave
   
   
10. “How Liquidity Providers Help Shape the Market” – CoinMarketCap
    
    
11. “Deflationary Tokens: The Impact of Supply on Value” – Medium
    
    
12. “Token Burn Mechanisms in DeFi” – Decrypt
    
    
13. “GMX Tokenomics Overview” – GMX.io
    
    
14. “The Effects of Token Burns on DeFi Projects” – Finextra
    ‍
15. ‍“Understanding Token Demand in DeFi Protocols” – CoinDesk

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 10: www.thestandard.io/blog/gmx-revolutionizing-defi-with-layer-2-scaling-governance-and-liquidity-innovation-in-2025-10