PAX Gold (PAXG): Digital Gold's Safe Haven in the 2025 Crypto Storm

Page 6

‍

Audits & Formal Verification: Paxos hasn’t published formal verification data, but given the simplicity of PAXG’s contract (it’s basically a token with fee and pause), standard audits suffice. If we look at similar Paxos token contracts, they have been proven secure over years.

In summary, the token architecture is robust, conservative, and enterprise-grade. Paxos has balanced the need for control (upgradeability, freeze functions) with the benefits of public blockchain (transparency and security). For an investor, this means the technology underpinning PAXG is not experimental; it’s built on established standards (ERC-20) and maintained by a competent in-house team. The decision to stick to Ethereum ensures maximum compatibility and security at the cost of some performance (Ethereum can handle ~15 TPS globally which is fine for PAXG’s current usage). If scaling is needed, Paxos can consider layer-2 solutions, but as of now on-chain transaction throughput for PAXG is not an issue (PAXG transfers per day are in hundreds, which Ethereum handles easily).

Custody and Physical Infrastructure

At the core of PAXG’s value is the physical gold custody infrastructure that backs the tokens. Paxos uses a network of trusted vault providers to store the allocated gold bars. Specifically, Paxos has disclosed that the gold underlying PAXG is held in Brink’s vaults in London (Brink’s is a leading bullion vault operator), and potentially also with the vault of the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) members (All about PAX Gold (PAXG) | Binance.US Help Center). The gold bars are London Good Delivery (LGD) bars, each around 400 oz of 99.5%+ purity gold, which is the standard for institutional trade (All about PAX Gold (PAXG) | Binance.US Help Center).

Allocated vs Unallocated Gold: Paxos holds the gold on an allocated basis. This is crucial – allocated gold means specific bars are set aside in the vault under Paxos’s name for the benefit of PAXG holders. This is unlike an unallocated account (where one just has a claim to X ounces from a pool). Allocated gold ensures that even if the vault operator went bankrupt, the bars are legally Paxos’s property, not the vault’s liability. Paxos mentions in their materials that PAXG is fully backed by allocated gold in “the most secure leading vaults” (). They also mention that institutional customers can redeem for unallocated London gold (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)) – meaning Paxos can convert allocated to unallocated if a client prefers (some banks trade in unallocated form for convenience). But for backing PAXG, Paxos keeps it allocated to eliminate counterparties beyond the vaulting service.

Each bar has a unique serial number, purity assay, and weight. Paxos’s internal ledger maps each bar (or fraction of bar) to token holders. When PAXG are created, Paxos either buys a new bar or allocates some from inventory. If someone buys, say, 10 PAXG (10 oz) and Paxos has a freshly added 400 oz bar, Paxos will allocate 10/400 of that bar to that customer. Multiple customers can share a bar in allocated form (allocated doesn’t always mean one bar per person; it can be a fractional allocation of each bar as long as records are precise). Paxos’s lookup tool shows if you hold PAXG, you might see you own, for example, 20 oz of bar #AB1234 and 5 oz of bar #XY6789, etc., totaling your 25 oz.

The vault infrastructure is presumably highly secure: these vaults are typically underground vaults in London, with armed security, 24/7 monitoring, etc. Brink’s (and similar vaults) also often have insurance for the contents. Paxos has explicitly stated customers’ gold is fully insured by the custodian against loss or theft (PAX Gold Fees - Paxos). The cost of that insurance is likely covered by Paxos (and implicitly by their fees).

In terms of audit of physical gold, Paxos engages third-party auditors to do physical counts. They likely use specialized bullion auditors to do periodic checks that the bar list Paxos has matches what’s in the vault. LBMA good delivery bars often come with chain-of-custody and assay certificates, so Paxos ensures only approved bars are used. If a bar is withdrawn (e.g., delivered to a redeemer), Paxos updates the records and adjusts allocations.

The logistics of adding or removing gold: Paxos can procure gold through bullion dealers or directly from refineries or banks. They probably have relationships with bullion banks to buy bars at London spot rates when needed for issuance. When they get a bar, Brink’s receives it and adds to Paxos’s holdings. For redemption, if someone redeems a whole bar, Paxos instructs Brink’s to release that bar (or ship it via armored transport to the client’s location). Partial redemption for physical (less than a bar) is handled via Alpha Bullion partnership or by pooling requests until a full bar is taken out.

It's worth noting Paxos’s operations ensure that total gold held = total PAXG tokens at all times, with a one-to-one ounce mapping. Even if multiple customers share bars, Paxos cannot allocate more ounces than a bar has. This is facilitated by their internal ledger system which likely automatically allocates new tokens to specific bars. If PAXG demand ever exceeded the number of bars available, Paxos would just acquire more bars – the London market is deep, and for tens or hundreds of thousands of ounces, liquidity is ample.

Redundancy and Safety: Paxos likely uses multiple vault locations for redundancy. Brink’s has vaults not just in London but around the world. However, since PAXG is specifically referencing London Good Delivery (Loco London), I suspect all or most are in London (which is fine, as London is the hub for gold). They might have vault agreements with others like Loomis or Malca-Amit as backups. The risk of a vault issue (fire, theft) is extremely low and insured. A bigger risk might be geopolitical – e.g., if a government seized gold in vaults (like how in 1930s the US banned gold). In London, under UK law, that risk is minimal and would cause global outcry. Still, from infrastructure perspective, having vaults in different jurisdictions could mitigate extreme scenarios. There’s no evidence Paxos does that currently, likely because regulatory comfort is highest with LBMA London bars.

Scaling Custody: As PAXG grows, Paxos will need to manage potentially more bars. But vaults can store massive quantities (London vaults hold ~9000 tonnes total, per LBMA reports). Paxos’s few tons are a drop in that bucket. The infrastructure can easily handle growth to tens of billions in value if needed by simply renting more vault space.

Connectivity to Digital Systems: Paxos’s custody platform connects the physical and digital. When Paxos mints or burns tokens, those actions are triggered by custody operations (receiving gold or delivering gold). Paxos likely has an internal system that ensures a new token mint doesn’t execute on-chain until confirmation that gold is in vault (or at least the trade to acquire it is locked in and will settle). Possibly Paxos takes some short time risk – for example, when a customer wires funds to buy PAXG, Paxos might mint PAXG slightly before the gold is physically in hand, trusting their gold supplier to deliver by end of day. However, given Paxos’s conservative nature, they might require the gold first. They also mention in their FAQ that for large transactions, settlement could be next business day (Paxos | Pax Gold (PAXG)), implying they wait for gold delivery for very big orders.

Insurance and Liability: Paxos’s terms likely state that if there’s a shortfall or loss in gold, Paxos will make customers whole using insurance or other assets. The trust structure means customer gold is not Paxos corporate asset, but Paxos would certainly use insurance claims to cover any incident. From an infrastructure viewpoint, this means Paxos has layered risk management: vault security, vault insurance, and corporate indemnification to protect token holders.

Technical Integration at Vault: There is an interesting possibility that Paxos might eventually use IoT or barcodes for bars to automate some checks. But currently, it’s probably manual processes (uploading bar serials into their system and reconciling with token data). The margin of error is tiny because everything is highly standardized in bullion handling.

In summary, the physical infrastructure behind PAXG is top-notch: LBMA-accredited bars in one of the world’s most secure vault systems. Paxos has effectively piggybacked on the existing robust infrastructure of the gold market and linked it with blockchain. For investors, this means one can trust that the gold is real, secure, and accessible. The combination of allocated storage and insurance addresses the key concerns around “is the gold really there when I need it?” As part of due diligence, an investor could even request to inspect their bars via Paxos (some high-net-worth individuals do vault visits). Knowing that the option exists, even if seldom used, is comforting. Paxos’s partnership with Brink’s and others is a strong backbone for PAXG’s credibility.

Security and Smart Contract Audits

Security is paramount for any asset-backed token, and PAXG’s record and practices reflect a comprehensive approach to both cyber and physical security.

Smart Contract Security: As mentioned, the PAXG smart contract was likely audited by specialists around the time of launch. Paxos hasn’t publicly released the audit, but given their relationships (for BUSD, they had audits done by firms like Nomic Labs or ChainSecurity, presumably), one can infer a similar rigor was applied to PAXG. Additionally, Paxos’s internal engineering would have done extensive testing. The fact that after launch, no security issues have come up with PAXG contract (no emergency upgrades needed aside from planned fee removal) indicates the contract is solid. The upgradable proxy does pose a theoretical risk if the upgrade key was compromised or misused, but Paxos likely mitigates that with multisig approvals and secure key storage.

Also, because PAXG contract allows freezing addresses, one could consider if that itself could be abused. If Paxos’s admin key were taken by a malicious actor, they could freeze accounts or attempt to steal funds by redirecting them. Paxos presumably guarded against this by not having a single point of failure for admin control, and by using time locks perhaps on certain functions. Some issuers, for example, put a time delay on upgrades to allow oversight. It’s unclear if Paxos does, but given regulatory oversight, any code changes would likely be reported to NYDFS.

Cybersecurity of Paxos Platform: Investors interface with Paxos through their web portal for account creation, or through APIs if they are integrators. Paxos runs a full-fledged financial IT system. They likely undergo regular penetration testing and SOC 2 audits. Paxos being a trust has to implement bank-level security (think multi-factor authentication, role-based access for internal systems, surveillance of transactions for anomalies, etc.). There have been no known breaches of Paxos’s systems. One relevant detail: Paxos’s stablecoin reserves (billions in cash equivalents) are held with banks, and stablecoin issuance/redemption flows through Paxos systems – any breach there would be catastrophic, but none has occurred. By extension, PAXG’s systems (which are simpler, just matching gold and tokens) benefit from the same rigorous security.

Physical Security & Chain of Custody: We touched on vault security. Brink’s and similar vaults use layered security: armed guards, biometric access controls, alarms, etc. Only authorized personnel can access the vault and typically it requires dual controls (two people present). Paxos likely has employees or contractors that can authorize bar movements. During a physical redemption, for example, the process might involve a Paxos rep present or coordinating with Brink’s. The chain of custody protocols ensure gold isn’t misplaced or tampered. LBMA bars have serials and verified weights, and audits check for any discrepancies.

Insurance and Disaster Recovery: Paxos’s insurance coverage for gold covers theft and damage. But what about digital insurance? Some crypto custodians carry insurance for digital asset theft (like if their private keys were hacked). Paxos being a trust may have a bond or insurance for employee malfeasance or cyber incidents too, though not publicly detailed. In any case, Paxos’s track record suggests strong internal controls. For example, issuance of PAXG likely requires multi-person approval – an employee can’t just mint tokens without a corresponding gold deposit because of checks in backend.

On disaster recovery, Paxos likely has backup sites for data, possibly running nodes in multiple regions to ensure Ethereum network connectivity and their own databases are redundant. If one data center goes down, their operations should continue from a secondary site. Also, Ethereum itself is decentralized, so PAXG token ledger is resilient unless Ethereum itself has issues.

Audits & Compliance: Paxos undergoes annual NYDFS examinations – these include evaluating cybersecurity, operational resilience, etc. (Update from Paxos CEO & Co-Founder Charles Cascarilla - Paxos | Newsroom). Additionally, Paxos would do internal audits and perhaps hire external firms to audit their compliance with NYDFS’s stringent cybersecurity regulations (NYDFS has specific cyber rules for financial institutions).

Test Scenarios: A part of security is how extreme scenarios are handled. E.g., if a large holder’s address is compromised (not Paxos’s fault, but the holder’s wallet hack), Paxos could freeze that address to prevent theft. This might salvage the gold for the rightful owner after sorting out identity. In practice, Paxos has rarely if ever used the freeze, as it undermines fungibility if overused. But it’s a security feature that could help in such a scenario. This is controversial in decentralized circles, but for institutional investors it might be reassuring that if something goes wrong (like a hack of their own account), Paxos might assist within legal boundaries.

Penetration Testing: It is common for companies like Paxos to hire outside experts to attempt to hack their systems (without prior knowledge of the internal teams, in a controlled manner). Paxos likely does this annually and addresses any findings. The absence of known issues indicates they either had none major or fixed them quietly.

Bug Bounty: Some crypto projects have bug bounty programs encouraging hackers to find vulnerabilities. Paxos, being more closed, hasn’t advertised a bug bounty, but they may quietly reward responsible disclosure. The Ethereum community at large also monitors token contracts, and any glaring bug in PAXG’s contract probably would have been spotted by independent researchers by now (given that code is public and similar to stablecoin contracts which have been scrutinized). The fact that PAXG’s contract hasn’t drawn alarm from security auditors in public is a good sign.

KPMG/Withum Attestations and Security: While those firms check financial matching, they also implicitly check some processes, like ensuring the mint/burn events correspond to money or gold movements. If Paxos’s internal controls were weak, an auditor might flag irregularities. None have been flagged publicly.

To conclude, security of PAXG’s technical and physical infrastructure appears to be handled at a very high standard. Paxos approaches security like a bank – layers of checks, minimal trust in single individuals, lots of oversight. They understand that even one security failure could destroy confidence in their product. From the evidence (or lack thereof of any breach), their security measures are effective. For investors, this reduces operational risk significantly. It means one can focus on market risk (gold price, liquidity) rather than worrying “what if the gold isn’t there or gets stolen” or “what if someone hacks the contract”. As with any system, risk is never zero, but PAXG’s security profile is likely as strong as any in the crypto industry for an asset-backed token. The insurance and regulatory audits provide backstops that many crypto projects don’t have, making PAXG’s security and audit framework a model for others.

Blockchain Integration and Interoperability

Being on Ethereum, PAXG inherently integrates well with the broad crypto ecosystem. Ethereum’s standards and tooling make it relatively straightforward to include PAXG wherever ERC-20 tokens are supported. Let’s explore how PAXG is integrated and how interoperable it is with other technologies:

Wallets and Custody Solutions: As an ERC-20, PAXG can be stored in any Ethereum-compatible wallet. This means hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor) and software wallets (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, etc.) all support PAXG by default (sometimes one might have to add the contract address if it’s not pre-listed, but that’s trivial). For institutional multi-signature custody, solutions like Fireblocks, BitGo, Copper and others have PAXG in their asset lists. Essentially, if a platform supports Ethereum assets, integrating PAXG is no extra effort beyond perhaps adding the token metadata. This high interoperability is a benefit of choosing Ethereum’s widely adopted standard.

DeFi Protocols: PAXG is increasingly integrated into DeFi. As of 2025:

• It’s available on Uniswap for swaps (with pools like PAXG-WETH, PAXG-USDC). Anyone can permissionlessly create liquidity pools with PAXG, which some have done. This gives PAXG holders the ability to swap trustlessly if needed, although liquidity is moderate.
  
  
• Lending: Compound added PAXG in 2020, allowing users to supply PAXG and borrow other assets (and vice versa) (Pax Gold (PAXG): Key Information - Coinhouse). Aave, as discussed, has had proposals. MakerDAO accepted PAXG as collateral in 2021 for minting DAI (with certain parameters). This means a PAXG holder can deposit their token to Maker, generate DAI stablecoin loans up to a % of its value. That effectively unlocks liquidity from gold holdings without selling – a powerful integration bridging gold to stablecoins.
  
  
• Yield farming: There have been vaults like Yearn that at times let PAXG holders earn yield by auto-switching between lending platforms to get the best rate (though gold borrowing demand is smaller than stablecoins, so yields have been modest, usually low single digits APY).

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 7: www.thestandard.io/blog/pax-gold-paxg-digital-golds-safe-haven-in-the-2025-crypto-storm-7