Part 2 / Page 14

‍

7.2.3 Smart Contract Security

• Stellar’s current scripting model limits complex smart contracts, reducing the attack surface relative to Ethereum-style Turing-complete environments (Messari Technical Review, 2024).
  
  
• The upcoming Soroban smart contracts platform introduces programmable contracts with Rust-based development. While this expands capabilities, it introduces new risks inherent in smart contract vulnerabilities such as reentrancy and integer overflows (Soroban Whitepaper, 2024).
  
  
• The Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) plans rigorous audits and formal verification of Soroban contracts to mitigate risks (SDF Roadmap, 2024).
  

7.3 Cybersecurity Threats Beyond the Blockchain Layer

7.3.1 Exchange and Wallet Security

• Many ecosystem participants interact with Stellar via centralized exchanges and wallets, which represent potential points of failure through hacking, phishing, and insider threats (CipherTrace Crypto Crime Report, 2024).
  
  
• Stellar-focused wallets such as Lobstr and Solar Wallet invest heavily in security features like multi-factor authentication (MFA), hardware wallet integration, and biometric controls (Lobstr Security Features).
  

7.3.2 Anchor Custody and Compliance Risks

• Anchors, which act as fiat on/off ramps, hold significant user funds and private keys. Security breaches at anchor level can lead to user losses and reputational damage (SDF Anchor Security Recommendations).
  
  
• SDF encourages anchors to employ regulated custodians, cold storage solutions, and regular security audits (SDF Compliance Handbook).
  

7.3.3 Infrastructure and Network Attacks

• Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks pose risks to network nodes and APIs; Stellar’s decentralized validator network and redundant infrastructure mitigate these threats (Stellar Network Status).
  
  
• Insider threats, software bugs, and supply chain vulnerabilities remain risks requiring ongoing monitoring and patching (OWASP Blockchain Security Guide).
  

7.4 Market Manipulation and Economic Risks

7.4.1 Token Price Volatility

• While XLM’s primary utility is transactional, its market price remains volatile, exposing users and investors to economic risks (CoinMarketCap XLM Historical Data).
  
  
• Price volatility can impact liquidity, user confidence, and ecosystem activity, particularly in emerging markets with sensitive economic conditions (Messari Market Volatility Analysis).
  

7.4.2 Market Manipulation Risks

• Crypto markets have historically been susceptible to pump-and-dump schemes, wash trading, and coordinated market manipulation (CFTC Crypto Market Surveillance Report, 2023).
  
  
• Stellar’s diverse token listings on multiple exchanges expose it to such risks; however, increasing exchange regulation and surveillance reduce prevalence (Chainalysis Crypto Crime Report, 2024).
  

7.4.3 Economic Attacks on the Network

• Low transaction fees and open access increase susceptibility to spam attacks aiming to congest the network (Stellar Network Spam Attack History).
  
  
• Stellar’s nominal fee per operation (0.00001 XLM) acts as an economic disincentive to such attacks, successfully mitigating this vector historically (Stellar Fees Overview).
  

7.5 Mitigations in Place and Planned Improvements

7.5.1 Technical Enhancements

• Ongoing validator decentralization efforts seek to increase the number of independent nodes to reduce centralization risks (SDF Validator Program).
  
  
• Soroban smart contracts undergo formal verification and security audits before launch, enhancing contract safety (Soroban Security).
  

7.5.2 Ecosystem and Governance

• The SDF encourages transparent governance practices, community participation, and open-source development to improve accountability and resilience (SDF Governance).
  
  
• Security incident response protocols and coordinated disclosure programs with ecosystem participants strengthen threat detection and mitigation (SDF Security Response).
  

7.5.3 Partnerships with Security Firms

• Stellar collaborates with cybersecurity firms and blockchain analytics providers like Chainalysis and CipherTrace to monitor illicit activity and protect network integrity (Chainalysis Partnership).
  

7.6 Overall Risk Posture

• Stellar maintains a moderate to low risk profile in terms of protocol security due to its consensus design and operational controls.
  
  
• However, risks exist around validator centralization, emerging smart contract vulnerabilities, and external ecosystem security, requiring continuous vigilance.
  
  
• Economic and market risks related to token volatility and manipulation are mitigated through regulatory compliance and ecosystem maturity but remain pertinent.
  

7.7 Conclusion (Security and Risks)

Security is a cornerstone of Stellar’s credibility and adoption. The network’s efficient, secure consensus mechanism, combined with a proactive approach to smart contract safety, cybersecurity, and market risk management, positions it as a reliable blockchain platform.

Yet, the expanding programmability of the network and increasing ecosystem complexity introduce new challenges. Stellar’s ongoing investments in technical upgrades, decentralization, compliance, and partnerships are essential to sustain a robust security posture amid evolving threats.

‍

‍

8. Financials & Funding

8.1 Fundraising History

Stellar Lumens’ development and growth have been underpinned by a blend of philanthropic, foundation-backed, and private funding. Unlike many blockchain projects that launched via ICOs or venture capital rounds, Stellar’s fundraising strategy reflects its nonprofit governance model.

• Initial Funding and Foundation Grants:
  Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) was initially funded by co-founder Jed McCaleb’s early contributions and philanthropic support from the likes of Stripe founder Patrick Collison and other angel investors (Stellar Foundation History).
  This nonprofit approach enabled the SDF to focus on long-term ecosystem development rather than rapid monetization.
  
  
• Token Distribution:
  The original supply of 100 billion XLM tokens was distributed with about 20% allocated to SDF for ecosystem grants, development, and operational costs. Early distributions to founders, partners, and the community were carefully structured with vesting schedules (Stellar Tokenomics, 2024).
  
  
• Venture Capital Involvement:
  Although SDF itself operates as a nonprofit, ecosystem companies and projects building on Stellar have attracted venture capital funding. For instance, startups like SureRemit and Lobstr have secured venture investments to scale services built on Stellar (Crunchbase Stellar Ecosystem).
  ‍
• Grant Programs and Partnerships:
  The SDF has issued millions in grants to developers, projects, and partners, fostering innovation while maintaining the network’s open-source ethos (SDF Grant Program).
  

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PART 2 / PAGE 15: www.thestandard.io/blog/stellar-lumens-xlm-from-remittances-to-defi----expanding-blockchain-utility-in-2025-part-2-15