Part 1 / Page 3

‍

Decentralization Aspects: TRON’s DPoS design makes it less decentralized than Ethereum but somewhat on par with other DPoS/PoSA chains. Only 27 SR nodes produce blocks (Kiln joins TRON Network as newest Super Representative | by TRON DAO | Mar, 2025 | Medium). This means block-production power is quite concentrated (compare Ethereum’s thousands of validators after PoS). TRON holders democratically elect SRs, but in practice a few large stakeholders (including the TRON Foundation and Justin Sun’s organization) have historically controlled enough votes to strongly influence the SR lineup (Tron Co-Founder and CTO Leaves Project, Alleging Excessive Centralization). Indeed, former TRON CTO Lucien Chen publicly alleged that 90% of voting power rested with a few SRs controlled by the foundation, making TRON “pseudo-decentralized” (Tron Co-Founder and CTO Leaves Project, Alleging Excessive Centralization). In short, while TRON is more decentralized than a single-authority network, it is significantly more centralized than Ethereum or Bitcoin. For context, BNB Chain (formerly BSC) uses 21 validators and has similar centralization complaints, while Solana has hundreds of validators but also faces centralization of stake. TRON has tried to improve decentralization over time: the creation of the community-governed TRON DAO (late 2024) transfers influence from the foundation to a broad DAO treasury, and SR elections remain open to any candidate who stakes the fee (Super Representatives) (Kiln joins TRON Network as newest Super Representative | by TRON DAO | Mar, 2025 | Medium). Nevertheless, its core dependence on a small, rotating set of validators remains. This architecture was chosen to optimize performance, but it inherently trades off some security and censorship-resistance. In practice, TRON is partly decentralized: governance is transparent and permissionless (voting on SRs happens publicly) but heavily weighted towards large holders.

Security Audits and Reliability: TRON’s code is open-source, and the project has invited external reviewers, but public reports of formal audits by top firms (e.g. Trail of Bits, OpenZeppelin) on the protocol are scarce. Instead, much of TRON’s security assurances come from its bug bounty and community oversight. The platform has been largely reliable: aside from the wallet-exploit above ( Over 14,500 Tron addresses at risk of silent hijacking — TradingView News), the network has seen no loss of consensus or unrecoverable failures. Daily transactions have risen steadily (from ~2.3M to ~2.8M in early 2025 (TRON DAO Daily Active Addresses Nearing All-Time High | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News)) without incident. The only notable disruptions were short maintenance windows or upgrades (e.g. migrating to TRON 4.0), which the team managed smoothly. The recent introduction of Stake 2.0 (April 2024) – allowing programmable delegation and smart-contract-managed staking – went live without known critical bugs, indicating improving maturity in governance features (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ). Overall, TRON’s uptime and stability rank high; any temporary issues have been quickly patched. Still, the small validator set means the network’s reliability is tied to SR node health: if a few SRs go offline, block times may slow, though backups (SR partners) mitigate this.

Tech Risks: Despite its strengths, TRON’s technical design carries some risks. The DPoS model means the network could theoretically suffer censorship or reorganization if a majority of SRs colluded maliciously. Long-term, a lack of truly independent node operators could pose a threat to integrity. The heavy focus on stablecoin throughput also concentrates value on a few token bridges; e.g. any failure in TRON-USDT bridges could severely affect network use. The TVM and associated features (like UpdateAccountPermission) have occasionally had subtle flaws – future complex features (like Stake 2.0’s programmability) may introduce new attack surfaces. Integration with Ethereum (through BTTC) exposes TRON to cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities. Additionally, the TRON VM’s resource model, while cost-effective, requires users to understand freezing/unfreezing mechanics; mistakes here have led to user errors (e.g. locking funds inadvertently). Finally, any novel consensus change (such as future sharding experiments) carries the usual risks of bugs. In summary, the infrastructure is robust but not immune: TRON minimizes external attacks via DPoS, but remains susceptible to governance capture, smart-contract bugs, and the inherent complexity of its resource system.

‍

‍

4. Tokenomics & Economic Model

Token Utility (Use Cases): TRX is the native utility token of the TRON network. Its primary functions are as follows:

• Transaction Fees: All on-chain TRON transactions and contract executions ultimately consume TRX (paid via bandwidth/energy points). In practice, routine transfers or simple contracts use the account’s free bandwidth, but if an account exhausts its bandwidth/energy, it pays TRX. Thus, TRX is the unit of value to settle network activity (Energy and Bandwidth of TRON – OneKey - Support) (What is Tron, and how does it work? A beginner’s guide). Fees on TRON are extremely low; the first 5,000 bytes/day are free, and even high-volume DeFi users burn trivial TRX by design (Energy and Bandwidth of TRON – OneKey - Support).
  
  
• Staking and Governance: TRX holders can freeze (lock) tokens to gain Tron Power (TP), which grants voting rights (Super Representatives). Each TRX frozen equals 1 TP. With TP, users vote for Super Representatives and SR partners. In essence, TRX is staked to secure the network and determine block producers. Votes also confer rewards: voters receive a share of block and voting rewards from SRs (Super Representatives). The Stake 2.0 upgrade (Apr 2024) further improved this by allowing programmable delegation of stakes via smart contracts, incentivizing longer lock-ups (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ).
  
  
• Rewards and Incentives: By staking and voting, TRX holders earn inflationary rewards in TRX itself. For each block, the producing SR gets 16 TRX, and an additional 160 TRX is distributed among all SRs (and their voters) (Super Representatives). Voters share these rewards proportional to their votes (minus a small SR commission). Thus, holding and staking TRX yields a steady annualized yield (commonly around 4–5% APY, depending on total stake). This creates an incentive to lock TRX.
  
  
• dApp and Ecosystem Use: TRX serves as the base currency in the TRON ecosystem. Developers can issue tokens (TRC-10/TRC-20) on TRON, but TRX underpins transactions. Some DeFi and gaming apps use TRX for collateral, rewards, or in-app payments (e.g. play-to-earn games on TRON).
  
  
• Gateway to Network Value: Because TRON has become a major settlement layer for USDT and other stablecoins, TRX’s utility is indirectly boosted. High-stakes transfers of USDT (and other assets) on TRON depend on TRX-powered blocks. This has made TRX a critical utility token for massive stablecoin flows (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ) (Cardano Knocked Out Of Top 10 Crypto Rankings As Tron Network’s TRX Rises ⋆ ZyCrypto).
  
  

(Benchmarking:) Unlike Ethereum’s ETH (pure gas and stake token) or Solana’s SOL (gas token with inflationary staking), TRX’s design combines transaction utility, staking power, and governance in one token. It is similar to EOS (also DPoS with resource staking) but distinguishes itself by its unique bandwidth/energy model (no per-transaction “gas”). Compared to BNB (used for gas on BNB Smart Chain), TRX also grants voting rights and stable free bandwidth, giving it a broader utility role.

Supply, Demand & Distribution: TRX was launched with 100 billion tokens; there is technically no absolute cap (TRON Price (TRX)), but all tokens were created at genesis and releases are controlled by protocol rules. As of 2025, about 94.9 billion TRX are circulating (TRON Price (TRX)) (TRON Price: TRX Live Price Chart, Market Cap & News Today | CoinGecko). The slight difference reflects tokens that remain locked or were not yet released from the foundation’s reserves. TRX was initially distributed via an ICO ($70M raised) and allocated to the TRON Foundation, ecosystem incentives, and a “mining fund.” The exact vesting schedule for pre-allocated TRX is not fully public; however, Justin Sun pledged to ultimately release locked tokens gradually, aligning with network growth. Large holders (foundation, early investors, exchanges) still control a significant portion of supply, a factor often cited in decentralization critiques (Tron Co-Founder and CTO Leaves Project, Alleging Excessive Centralization).

Demand for TRX comes from network usage and staking. Massive stablecoin issuance on TRON (USDT alone reached ~$70B) means constant high throughput demand (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ) (Cardano Knocked Out Of Top 10 Crypto Rankings As Tron Network’s TRX Rises ⋆ ZyCrypto). TRX is the currency that powers all these transactions. TRON’s DeFi and dApp activity (the second-highest L1 TVL, surpassing BNB Chain (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report )) also locks TRX as collateral and fees, maintaining demand. The issuance schedule (block rewards) plus fees/penalties controls supply flow. Notably, TRX’s annual supply growth is currently negative: Cointelegraph reports TRON’s annual inflation at –2.4% (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ), meaning supply is effectively shrinking 2.4% per year. This deflationary trend is achieved through mechanisms like periodic burns or reduced block rewards (TRON transitioned to lower issuance around 2020). In contrast, Ethereum’s inflation is +0.4% yearly (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ). Thus, TRX supply slowly declines over time, placing upward pressure on price if demand remains steady.

As for distribution, precise data is sparse. The concentration risk noted in governance implies the largest wallets hold outsized shares. Exchanges hold large TRX reserves, and the Foundation itself holds a multi-billion TRX reserve for ecosystem grants. “Sun Flower Alliance” programs also distributed TRX-based tokens (JST, SUN, etc.), indirectly influencing TRX’s distribution. Overall, TRX supply distribution is somewhat top-heavy, though millions of smaller holders exist as well (TRON had ~1.9M active wallets as of Aug 2024 (Cardano Knocked Out Of Top 10 Crypto Rankings As Tron Network’s TRX Rises ⋆ ZyCrypto)).

Inflation/Deflation Mechanics: TRX has no new minting beyond its genesis allocation; instead, new token issuance comes from block rewards. However, TRON has structured these rewards to result in net deflation. Originally, each block created 176 TRX total (Super Representatives), but in 2020 TRON adjusted its economics so that transaction fees (in TRX) are burned or redistributed, offsetting block inflation. The cited –2.4% annual rate (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ) suggests that the net effect of issuance versus burns/locks is a shrinking supply. For example, some transaction fees may be permanently deducted, and in 2022 TRON removed block mining rewards for consumers, pushing more rewards to staking. The deflationary model contrasts with Ethereum or Bitcoin, which increase supply over time (albeit slowly). This deflation is designed to reward long-term holders: as supply drops, each TRX potentially represents more value. It also mitigates dilution from staking rewards, making staking yield less than issuance rate, which encourages holding TRX. Stake 2.0 further “encourages users to hold staked TRX” (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ), indicating that locked tokens may effectively be removed from circulation (for a period). Overall, TRX is trending deflationary, which is unusual among major L1 tokens.

Vesting Schedule: Public details on TRX vesting are limited. It is known that a significant portion of TRX was initially held by the foundation and early investors, likely subject to multi-year vesting or release schedules. Justin Sun had promised to burn or redeem the unsold ICO tokens over time, effectively locking them away. However, transparency on remaining locked supply is low. The lack of clarity on vesting terms means investors face uncertainty: if large locked stakes were suddenly released, they could exert downward pressure on price. Conversely, if locked tokens are truly retired (as some have claimed), that contributes to deflation. This opacity in TRX vesting schedules is often cited as a risk factor for token economics, although the ongoing deflation suggests controlled release.

Staking and Locking Mechanisms: TRX staking is performed by freezing tokens, which locks them for at least 3 days (72 hours). When you freeze TRX, you choose to receive either Bandwidth Points or Energy. Bandwidth lets you conduct ordinary transactions fee-free (up to the daily allotment); Energy is used for smart contract executions (Energy and Bandwidth of TRON – OneKey - Support). In practice, users often freeze TRX to get bandwidth (for paying fees) and gain Tron Power for voting. Once frozen, TRX cannot be spent until it is unfrozen (after 3 days), ensuring a temporary lock-up. Unfreezing takes another 3 days, during which tokens remain locked and votes stay in effect. Stakers earn rewards via the SR block rewards described above (Super Representatives). Because each block’s 176 TRX (16+160) is shared with voters, locking TRX to vote yields a portion of that reward. In the current economy, staking TRX provides an effective APR of a few percent (estimates ~4.2%), competing with other PoS chains. The Stake 2.0 upgrade (Q2 2024) also introduced delegatable staking: users can delegate their staked TRX to SRs via smart contracts while still retaining some liquidity, and “programmable delegation” allows building staking pools or DeFi products around TRX lock-ups (How Tron’s upgrades are reshaping the digital economy: Report ).

Economic Incentives and Risks: The TRX economic model creates clear incentives to stake and hold the token: staking secures the network and yields TRX rewards, while deflationary supply boosts potential value. Regular uses of TRX (transaction fees, collateral in dApps) ensure ongoing demand. However, there are notable risks: if network usage stagnates, demand for TRX would drop, leaving deflation unopposed, likely hurting price. TRON’s high dependency on USDT/Tether flows means regulatory or market shocks to stablecoins could indirectly impact TRX usage. For example, if Tether changes networks or is outcompeted, TRON’s throughput might fall.

Another key risk is regulatory and project risk. In 2023, the US SEC sued Tron’s founder Justin Sun and the TRON DAO for alleged unregistered sales of TRX (and BTT) tokens (What is Tron, and how does it work? A beginner’s guide). The outcome could affect TRX’s legal status in large markets. Moreover, Justin Sun’s management style (often criticized as centralized) means TRX price can react to his announcements or controversies. Centralization issues (see below) are also economic risks: if holders lose confidence that TRON is “truly decentralized,” they may sell TRX. On the flip side, TRX incentives align holder and network interests: voting brings yield, and fees burned push price up. Comparatively, ETH’s shift to Proof-of-Stake created staking incentives, but TRX started with staking from day one. TRX’s reward model is somewhat analogous to EOS and Tezos (both PoS delegates with voters earning returns), whereas tokens like SOL or ADA pay staking rewards but do not tie fees to inflation.

Liquidity and Exchange Presence: TRX is one of the most liquid cryptocurrencies. It is listed on nearly every major exchange (Binance, Crypto.com, OKEx, Huobi, Poloniex, etc.) and even some regulated ones (e.g. Coinbase). According to CoinGecko, TRX trades across 1,290 exchanges and markets (TRON Price: TRX Live Price Chart, Market Cap & News Today | CoinGecko), reflecting extensive availability. Daily trading volumes routinely run in the hundreds of millions to over a billion USD. For example, on March 12, 2025 TRX’s 24h volume was ~$1.2 billion (TRON DAO Daily Active Addresses Nearing All-Time High | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News), indicating deep liquidity. Major trading pairs include TRX/USDT and TRX/BTC, with Binance’s TRX/USDT alone handling ~$450M in 24h (TRON DAO Daily Active Addresses Nearing All-Time High | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News). This broad exchange presence spreads liquidity and reduces exchange risk. Even so, some concentration exists: much of the volume follows USDT pairs, so any shock affecting stablecoin markets could transiently affect TRX liquidity. Exchange liquidity risk is otherwise low – TRX is not typically a low-liquidity or thinly-traded token like many small altcoins. A large holder could sell TRX in bulk, but the expansive order books on top exchanges make such moves less disruptive than on illiquid chains.

Market Capitalization Context: As of early 2025, TRX’s market capitalization is on the order of $20–25 billion. For example, CoinGecko reports a TRX market cap of $23.43 B (TRON Price: TRX Live Price Chart, Market Cap & News Today | CoinGecko). This places TRX around the #9–10 position among all cryptocurrencies. By comparison, Ethereum’s market cap is roughly an order of magnitude larger ($219 B (TRON(TRX) vs Ethereum(ETH) Market Cap Comparison | Bitget)), and Solana’s is ~$79 B (TRON(TRX) vs Solana(SOL) Market Cap Comparison | Bitget). Bitget’s market cap comparison shows TRX is only ~10.7% of ETH’s market cap (TRON(TRX) vs Ethereum(ETH) Market Cap Comparison | Bitget) and ~29.7% of SOL’s (TRON(TRX) vs Solana(SOL) Market Cap Comparison | Bitget). Binance Coin (BNB) typically hovers above SOL (often in the $40–50 B range in 2025), so TRX is roughly half or less of BNB’s cap. In other words, TRX is a top-10 token but much smaller than the largest L1 tokens. Analysts note that TRX’s recent rise (e.g. dethroning ADA from #9 in Aug 2024) was driven largely by its booming stablecoin volume (Cardano Knocked Out Of Top 10 Crypto Rankings As Tron Network’s TRX Rises ⋆ ZyCrypto) (Cardano Knocked Out Of Top 10 Crypto Rankings As Tron Network’s TRX Rises ⋆ ZyCrypto). If TRON continues to grow its DeFi and payment usage, TRX might capture a higher market cap; if it falters, TRX could easily slip in the rankings. The relationship between TRX and peers also shows tokenomics differences: unlike most proof-of-stake chains, TRX’s market cap is deflation-driven and tied tightly to fee-burning and staking yields.

Project vs Other Token Models: TRX’s tokenomics differ from many peers. Ethereum’s ETH and Solana’s SOL serve as both gas and staking tokens (inflationary PoS), but they rely on network fees for value accrual. TRX is more analogous to EOS or Tezos, where users stake tokens for on-chain resources and vote. However, TRX adds a twist with its free bandwidth model. Unlike ETH, where every transaction burns gas (increasing net deflation after EIP-1559), TRX transactions are usually free until resources run out (Energy and Bandwidth of TRON – OneKey - Support). TRON also intentionally set a high issuance (block rewards) initially, but then moved to deflation via burns, whereas ETH’s issuance was reduced but still net positive prior to Shanghai, and SOL remains net inflationary. Compared to BNB, which subsidized chain usage by burning a portion of transaction fees (BNB burn), TRX’s model mainly burns or omits issuance differently. TRX also is not backed by any commodity or dividend; its “value capture” relies purely on network usage and staking demand. In summary, TRX’s model is unique: it combines DPoS staking, fee-based burn, and targeted inflation control to align incentives. This can be contrasted with, say, Ethereum’s fixed monetary policy or Solana’s high inflation with massive staking rewards.

Exchange Liquidity Risks: While TRX is liquid, it is not immune to exchange-related risks. If major exchanges were to suspend TRX trading (e.g. due to regulatory issues), liquidity would suffer dramatically. For instance, if U.S. exchanges had to delist TRX because of the SEC case, it could fragment TRX liquidity. However, TRX’s global presence and many non-US-listed venues mitigate this somewhat. There is also the risk that TRX markets are dominated by a few exchanges or market makers; if one large player withdrew, spreads could widen temporarily. Finally, because TRX trading volume is tightly correlated with stablecoin demand, any stablecoin market shock (like a USDT depeg) could cause abrupt volume changes in TRX pairs.

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PART 1 / PAGE 4: www.thestandard.io/blog/tron-trx-a-scalable-blockchain-bet-on-emerging-market-adoption-and-stablecoin-dominance-in-2025-4